This article was first published by The Guardian on 7th December 2016
Norman Lamb, Liberal Democrat MP for North Norfolk and former Minister of State for Care & Support
If mental health is the Cinderella service of the NHS, then child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) is the Cinderella service of the Cinderella service. It’s a cliche that bears repeating, because the reality of children’s mental health services in this country still falls woefully short of the vision set by the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives during the coalition government.
One in 10 children suffers from depression, anxiety or another diagnosable mental health problem, and 75% of mental illness starts before the age of 18. Intervening early with effective, evidence-based support can not only stop a child’s condition deteriorating to crisis point, but also have a transformative effect on long-term recovery and life prospects in adulthood.
When mental ill health costs the economy an estimated £105bn every year, the economic as well as the moral case for prioritising children’s mental health is unanswerable. But when I became minister, I was horrified by what I witnessed.
For too many people, help is not available when they need it. Nearly a quarter of young people referred to specialist CAMHS services are turned away, often because they fail to meet outrageous eligibility thresholds. The anorexic teenager is denied treatment until she becomes dangerously thin. The boy with OCD is told there is no specialist support until he has experienced repeated suicidal thoughts. And those who do get treatment are often faced with excruciating waiting times, which can vary dramatically across the country.
As well as being morally indefensible, it is the antithesis of the important principle of early intervention. We have ended up with a grossly inefficient system designed to treat rather than prevent mental ill health in children. Fragmented, tiered services are complex and dysfunctional, while the perverse financial incentives in the system fail to encourage a focus on prevention and instead push children into specialist acute settings where NHS England picks up the bill, rather than local clinical commissioning groups.
Determined to address this appalling situation, I set up a task force. The result was Future in mind: a blueprint for the modernisation of child and adolescent mental health services, backed by extra funding of £250m each year until 2020.
At its heart is a significant shift towards the prevention of ill health, working with schools to strengthen resilience and improve support before health deteriorates. Attracting support from across the political spectrum, it was subsequently endorsed by NHS England’s own five-year plan for mental health.
The Conservative government, however, has shown little drive to deliver on this golden opportunity. In the first year of the promised investment, only £143m was released instead of the £250m expected. Mental health providers have reported that the money failed to reach frontline services, with many still seeing cuts to their budgets.
Worse still, the government chose not to make up this £107m shortfall in the second year of the programme. Nor was the money that was allocated to clinical commissioning groups ringfenced, so there is a real risk that it will leak out to other local priorities such as A&E waiting times.
It’s hardly surprising that we’ve not seen the progress many had hoped for. The Education Policy Institute’s commission on children’s mental health, which I chair, recently published its final report, highlighting that excessive waiting times and treatment thresholds are still commonplace. There also remains a dreadful cliff edge at the age of 18 when young people make the transition from CAMHS to adult services.
The health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, recently pledged his commitment to CAMHS, which he rightly identified as the “biggest single area of weakness” in the NHS. But rhetoric is not enough. It’s now time for a bold statement of intent, otherwise all momentum will be lost.
We need to see a bold programme of reform – implementing the principles of Future in mind – with an ambitious focus on schools and prevention, early intervention, and improving access to high-quality services. The EPI commission called for the government to use the additional £250m a year as a lever to drive continued change, making receipt of the money conditional on areas demonstrating that all the money is being spent on children and that there is an ambitious programme to shift resources to prevention. Each area should also be expected to demonstrate that they have delivered on their plans.
The chronic underfunding of children’s mental health services must be consigned to history. Despite receiving a paltry 0.7% of the total NHS budget, CAMHS is too often at the front of the queue when there are cuts or “efficiencies” to be made. The health secretary should make it his priority to reverse this scandalous disinvestment, pushing and cajoling the NHS to ensure that every last penny of the extra money secured by the Liberal Democrats is spent as intended.
Children and young people have been let down for too long. We know what an effective and modern children’s mental health service looks like, and we have a roadmap for how to get there. Responsibility now lies with the government to deliver on it so that all young people receive the support they need to flourish and achieve their full potential.
Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrat MP for North Norfolk, has written to the Chair of the Education Select Committee in support of the Norfolk Foster Care Association’s proposals for reforming the fostering system.
In October, the Committee launched a new inquiry into fostering in England, looking at a range of issues including the adequacy of current recognition and support given to foster carers, challenges in recruitment and retention, and the stability of foster care placements for looked-after children.
In its submission to the inquiry, the Norfolk Foster Care Association (NFCA) has highlighted a range of serious concerns about the fostering system. These include, but are not limited to:
- inadequate support for foster carers from local authorities;
- frequent and unnecessary removal of children from their established foster placements;
- a lack of legal protections for foster carers who blow the whistle on bad practice; and
- a failure to ensure that allegations or complaints about foster carers are investigated fairly.
The NFCA also questioned the fairness and legality of Norfolk County Council’s implementation of the ‘Staying Put’ initiative. The scheme supports young people to remain with their foster families beyond their 18th birthday, but a cap on funding in Norfolk currently discriminates against young people wishing to remain with ‘Level 5’ foster carers, who receive the highest pay rates because of their specialist knowledge and experience.
The NFCA has put forward a set of recommendations to improve the fostering system so that it better supports foster carers and the vulnerable young people who depend on them. Key recommendations include:
- better support for foster care associations from local councils;
- statutory whistleblowing protections for foster carers;
- new standards to ensure that investigations into foster carers are conducted fairly;
- more robust processes for removing children from their foster placements; and
- a Central Register to overcome recruitment challenges and allow foster carers to relocate more easily to other parts of the country.
In a letter to the Education Committee chair Neil Carmichael MP, Norman Lamb, a long-time campaigner for better rights for foster carers, endorsed the NCFA’s proposals for strengthening the system. He has also called for representatives from the NCFA to be invited to give spoken evidence to the inquiry at future meetings.
Commenting, Norman Lamb said:
“Foster carers play a hugely valuable role in caring for society’s most vulnerable children, and it’s a great scandal that they are so often denied the support, rights and protections they deserve. This ultimately has a damaging effect on the wellbeing of looked-after children who, above all else, are in need of safety and stability.
“This inquiry is a timely opportunity to shine a light on some of the most egregious failings in the system and provide a catalyst for change. I am very pleased to support the NFCA’s involvement in the process, and hope that the Education Committee will take its important recommendations on board.”
Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrat MP for North Norfolk, has called on the Chancellor to ensure that rural areas get a fair slice of new funding for improving Britain’s roads.
In his first Autumn Statement tomorrow (Wednesday 23rd November), Chancellor Philip Hammond is set to announce an extra £1.3bn for improving Britain’s roads, to ease congestion in towns and cities and upgrade transport networks.
Mr. Lamb has now urged the Chancellor to make sure that rural areas share the benefit of this investment as well as towns and cities, particularly country roads prone to flooding.
Commenting on the eve of the Autumn Statement, he said:
“Roads and transport links are a crucial part of Britain’s infrastructure, so the announcement of additional investment is welcome.
“However, Mr. Hammond must make sure that a fair share of this money is spent on maintaining rural roads. Roads in Norfolk have not been well enough maintained in recent years with cutbacks to funding. They are often hit by flooding problems because of inadequate drainage, causing great inconvenience to local residents and damage to the local economy. The sad truth is that the Government doesn't seem to realise that they will pay the price for this neglect in years to come.
"Better maintenance and better drainage in rural areas must be a priority, and my challenge to the Chancellor is to provide a cast-iron guarantee that communities like Norfolk will not miss out on this much-needed investment.”
More vulnerable people will suffer from failures of care unless the Government addresses the chronic underfunding of the social care system in next week’s Autumn Statement, Norman Lamb has warned.
This week, the North Norfolk MP challenged the Health Secretary to confront the growing crisis in social care, and repeated his call for the Government to work together with other political parties to develop a sustainable long-term funding settlement. Speaking in a House of Commons debate, he said:
“Does the Secretary of State ever feel that he is confronted by a pretty fundamental choice? He can either preside over a system that deteriorates with an increasing number of failures of care, which I know he cares passionately about, or he can be the politician in Government who confronts that, who works with other parties and who comes up with a sustainable long-term solution. It is one or the other. I urge him to take the latter course.”
The care sector is teetering on the brink of collapse. Despite an ageing population and rapidly rising demand for care services, spending on social care in the UK is set to fall to less than 1% of GDP by the end of the decade. Cuts to the budgets of local authorities have meant that increasing numbers of elderly and disabled social care users are not receiving adequate support to live independently, and are left to fend for themselves unless they can afford to pay for care.
Avoidable hospital admissions caused by a lack of community care have also exacerbated pressure on hospital departments which are already over-stretched. In September, a total of 196,246 hospital bed days were lost due to delays in discharging patients who were medically well enough to leave hospital – the highest number since records began. The main reason for these delays was a lack of follow-up care in the community.
The Liberal Democrats have long called for the creation of a cross-party commission to find an efficient and effective solution to the existential threat to the future of the NHS and social care, and have set up an expert group to look at the case for a dedicated Health and Care Tax. In this week’s debate, Norman Lamb repeated his plea to the government and opposition parties to be pragmatic and open-minded on the possibility of a tax to sustain these cherished services for future generations:
“All of us on both sides of the House must confront the chronic underfunding of the health and care system, and we need to find ways to raise significantly more resources to ensure we have a modern and efficient health and care system.”
The social care precept, which was announced in last year’s Spending Review, allows local authorities to increase council tax by an extra 2% per annum to raise extra funds for social care. The Government is reported to be considering lifting the 2% cap, in order to allow local areas to raise yet more money for social care at no extra cost to the Treasury. But in a letter to the Health Secretary, Mr. Lamb has warned that the Government must not treat the social care precept as an excuse to starve local authorities of the central funding required to provide care users with the support they need. He wrote:
“Last year, I welcomed the social care precept as a means of providing additional flexibility to local authorities – but only on the condition that this serves to supplement, rather than replace, a fair allocation of resources to local authorities from central government.
“With councils coming under ever greater financial strain, reliance on the social care precept to fund care services will inevitably entrench and widen regional health inequalities, as poorer parts of the country with the greatest health needs are less able to raise the resources needed. Having read reports that the Government intends to lift the 2% cap on the social care precept, I would appreciate your thoughts on this.”
Commenting ahead of the Autumn Statement, Norman Lamb said:
“Emergency funding is desperately needed to halt the rapid deterioration of the care sector. The system is now at breaking point, which will have devastating consequences for elderly and disabled people who are told that there is no care available. The Government knows this, so it would be unthinkable for the Prime Minister and the Chancellor not to act in next week’s Autumn Statement.”
The cross-party ‘Equality 4 Mental Health’ campaign, co-founded by North Norfolk MP Norman Lamb, has won the backing of nine former Health Secretaries in calling on the Prime Minister and the Chancellor to address the continuing injustice suffered by people with mental ill health in next week’s Autumn Statement.
The health secretaries, who served under both Labour and the Conservatives, have been joined by seven former health ministers, the former Chief Executive of NHS England, a former Permanent Secretary at the Department of Health, the current chair of the Health Select Committee, and leading mental health charities Mind and Rethink Mental Illness.
The 'Equality 4 Mental Health' campaign was launched ahead of last year's spending review by Lib Dem MP Norman Lamb, Tory MP Andrew Mitchell and Time to Change Ambassador Alastair Campbell. 250 leaders from across society joined the demand for an end to the historic injustice of discrimination against the mentally ill within the NHS, and the then Chancellor George Osborne recognised the work of the campaign in announcing an extra £600m for mental health services.
However, many of the examples of injustice and discrimination that were identified a year ago are still all-too-evident evident today.
Many mental health trusts continue to experience cuts to their budgets despite the rhetoric of ‘parity of esteem’ from Government and NHS England. Suicide remains the biggest killer of men under the age of 45 in the UK. Mental health research receives a disproportionately small amount of public funding, and flagship new treatment standards for people suffering from a first episode of psychosis have not been backed by the necessary resources.
In her first speech as Prime Minister, Theresa May promised to fight “burning injustice” in British society, highlighting that there is too often “not enough help to hand” for those who suffer from mental health conditions. She is right, and now has the opportunity to address this.
Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrat spokesperson and former Minister of State for Care and Support, said:
“It is a stain on our country that people with mental ill health are so often treated as second class citizens. Last year’s joint statement sent a powerful message that this cannot be tolerated, but still we are reminded on a weekly basis how people with mental illness are left without the treatment and support they desperately need.
“Promised investment hasn’t made the difference many expected – especially in services for children and young people, where the majority of mental health problems begin. At a time when the prevalence of mental illness seems to be rising, it would be negligent for the Government not to act.
Alastair Campbell, former Director of Communications to Tony Blair and co-founder of Equality 4 Mental Health, said:
“We welcome the fact that stigma around mental illness is decreasing but are concerned that the services are not there to match the need. The Prime Minister’s expressed commitment to tackling the growing mental health crisis is welcome, and the Autumn Statement is a golden opportunity for her to deliver on this rhetoric.”
Andrew Mitchell, Conservative MP for Sutton Coldfield and former International Development Secretary and Government Chief Whip, said:
“We are concerned at the new evidence emerging of inequalities in the mental health system based on age, gender, ethnicity and social class. Promised funding for children and young people’s mental health is not getting through to where it is needed in many parts of the country. NHS Digital has also exposed a dramatic increase in mental illness and self-harm among young women in recent years, while people from Black British communities and lower-income households are less likely to receive treatment for common mental disorders.
“People of all political stripes, who share a belief in the fundamental principle of equality for mental health, must work together to make this ambition a reality.”
The full statement is as follows:
A year ago, 250 leaders from across society came together to make a plea to Government – to deliver EQUALITY4MENTALHEALTH. The campaign highlighted the current gross disadvantage suffered by those with mental ill health within our publicly funded NHS and urged action from the Government to end this historic injustice.
We called on ministers to deliver on their public commitment to parity between physical and mental health, to ensure for those who suffer from mental ill health equal, timely access to treatment as others enjoy, the same right to the best evidence-based treatment and an equitable share of health research funding.
We were encouraged by the supportive response of the then Prime Minister David Cameron and above all by the announcement of extra funds for mental health by then Chancellor George Osborne. We also welcome the ambitious plans set out in NHS England's Five Year Forward View for Mental Health, and the continued investment in the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme. We particularly welcome, on the day she took office, the new Prime Minister's stated intention to focus on mental health.
However, despite the warm words, one year on, we see the same enduring injustice, the massive economic cost of neglect of mental ill health - estimated to be £105bn a year - and the distress suffered by countless families across the country because of failures of the system adequately to support people in need.
In particular we highlight:
1. Despite the promised increases in funding, mental health trusts in England are still suffering cuts to their budgets. Two in every five trusts saw their budgets cut in 2015-16, according to analysis by the King’s Fund. 
2. Suicide remains the biggest killer of men under the age of 45 in the UK and the rate has been increasing in recent years. The male suicide rate was three times higher than the female rate in 2014.  
3. People experiencing a mental health crisis are still routinely shunted across the country in search of a hospital bed. Last year, nearly 5,500 mental health patients in England had to travel out of area to receive treatment – an increase of 13% from the previous year. 
4. Services for children and young people are going backwards in many areas, with up to 75% getting no support or treatment at all for mental health conditions. Children and young people's mental health services receive just 0.7% of the total NHS budget. In the first year of promised additional investment, only £143m was allocated instead of the £250m expected.
5. Children and young people with eating disorders and mental illness are still too often turned away unless they reach high thresholds for treatment, such as a low BMI and repeated suicidal thoughts. 
6. There is evidence of a growing mental health crisis among young women. More than a quarter (28%) of women aged 16-24 have a mental health disorder, according to a major report by NHS Digital, while reports of self-harm trebled in this group to 19.7% between 2007 and 2014. There needs to be greater understanding of the reasons for this trend, though childhood trauma, sexual abuse, low self-esteem and social media pressures have been cited as possible contributing factors. 
7. People experiencing a first episode of psychosis are being denied the timely package of specialist treatment they should be entitled to under flagship new treatment standards in the NHS. Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) is being restricted to patients under the age of 35 across a quarter of the country, while most CCGs are unable to say how much they had spent on the service or whether their care package is delivered in line with official requirements. 
8. There are inequalities in access to treatment for mental health disorders related to socio-economic class and ethnic background. White British adults are more than twice as likely to receive treatment as black adults for common mental disorders, while people living in lower income households are more likely to have requested but not received a particular mental health treatment. 
9. Significant concerns that the potential value of Sustainability and Transformation Plans to bring all parts of the health and care system together will be undermined if mental health is peripheral to plans under development across the country.
10. Research into mental ill health continues to lose out with just 5.5% of research funding going to mental health compared to a share of the total disease burden of about 23%. 
We are alarmed and dismayed that so many of these points echo those made a year ago when promises of real change were made by the previous Prime Minister and Chancellor. We call on their successors, Mrs May and Mr Hammond, to address this disadvantage in the Autumn Statement and to make good the promise to achieve genuine equality or parity of esteem for those suffering mental ill health.
Norman Lamb, Alastair Campbell, Andrew Mitchell (Co-founders, Equality4Mental Health)
Andy Burnham, Ken Clarke, Frank Dobson, Stephen Dorrell, Patricia Hewitt, Alan Johnson, Andrew Lansley, Alan Milburn, John Reid (Former Secretaries of State for Health)
Paul Burstow, Caroline Flint, Tessa Jowell, Norman Lamb, Ivan Lewis, Dan Poulter (Former Ministers of State and Parliamentary Under-Secretaries of State for Health)
Sarah Wollaston (Chair, Health Select Committee)
David Nicholson (Former Chief Executive, NHS England)
Lord Crisp (Former Permanent Secretary, Department of Health)
The Government must take urgent action reverse the growing crisis in NHS maternity care, Norman Lamb MP has warned, after ministers confirmed that the number of student midwives fell by more than 300 last year.
In response to a written parliamentary question from Mr. Lamb, the Liberal Democrat spokesperson for Health, the Minister of State for Health Philip Dunne revealed that there were just 6,350 student midwives training at the end of 2015/16. This compares to 6,662 in the previous year, amounting to fall in the number of student midwives of almost 5%.
The figures were revealed on the same day that new maternity ratings were published, showing that maternity services in 74 per cent of CCGs are in need of improvement.
A recent report by the Royal College of Midwives also found that some maternity units are ‘dangerous’ as a result of overstretched staff and poor working conditions, warning that the NHS is facing an exodus of demoralised and overworked midwives.
The Government has published an action plan for ‘Safer maternity care’ to drive up the quality and safety of maternity services in the NHS, but Mr. Lamb has warned that ministers must provide evidence that the situation is improving quickly. He said:
“The alarming decline in the number of student midwives could have dangerous consequences when maternity services are already buckling under pressure. It is even more concerning given the risk that fewer staff will come from other parts of Europe following the Brexit vote.
“The blunt truth is that the NHS will not be able to properly care for mothers and their babies unless we are training enough midwives. New mothers are not being given the care and attention they deserve because staff are exhausted and rushed off their feet, and this must be addressed as a number one priority.
“The recent measures announced by the Government are welcome, but there will need to be immediate evidence that progress is being made. We cannot afford to let this crisis turn into a catastrophe.
“The Secretary of State must provide cast-iron assurances that more midwives will be trained next year. After the removal of student bursaries, it is vital that new incentives are put in place to ensure that midwifery remains a viable, attractive and rewarding career path for people from all backgrounds.”
Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrat MP for North Norfolk, has condemned the Government's announcement that funding for community pharmacy will be slashed by more than 7% over the next two years.
Pharmacies are the lifeblood of local communities, providing advice, support and treatment to 1.6 million people every day. In September, the Department of Health paused its plans to reduce funding for these services, after pharmacists and local residents warned that reduced access to pharmacies for those who rely on them will put more pressure on overstretched GP surgeries and hospitals.
The Government re-opened negotiations with the Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee (PSNC) and other stakeholders in light of these protests - but today confirmed, in a statement to Parliament, that pharmacies will lose 4% of their funding in 2016/17 and a further 3.4% in 2017/18.
The Health Minister also announced changes to the funding system, so that payments to pharmacies will be more closely linked to the services they provide. However, he confirmed that the annual pharmacy budget will be reduced from £2.8bn to less than £2.6bn over the next two years, and critics have suggested that these cuts could lead to 3,000 pharmacies being closed across the country as a result.
Challenging the Government's cost-cutting agenda in the House of Commons, Norman Lamb said:
"There is no escaping the fact that this amounts to a significant cut in prevention services, which is what always happens when the finances of the NHS are under pressure. I absolutely accept the need for reform of the financial incentives involved, to ensure that we get the best outcomes from the money being spent, but surely we should be investing more in prevention in order to ensure that the NHS is sustainable."
In response, Health Minister David Mowat offered a vague suggestion of additional funding for prevention services - despite the heavy cuts to public health budgets previously announced by the Government. He said:
"The quality system that I have mentioned is about potentially investing more in prevention and linking the best pharmacies—the high quality pharmacies—more closely to local authorities, public health schemes and all that goes with that. I make the point again that there is a requirement for efficiency savings, but we do not believe that they will affect access overall. We do not believe that this will affect the public’s ability to use pharmacies as they do now. This will be part of modernising and digitising the service and providing resources for other parts of the NHS that need them very much.
Commenting afterwards, Norman Lamb rejected the idea that reducing pharmacy budgets would save money or make the health service more efficient.
“The Government’s belief that cutting funding for community pharmacies will improve efficiency in the NHS is a complete false economy", he said.
“These myopic plans will further increase pressure on GP surgeries and hospitals that are already buckling under the strain of limited resources and unprecedented demand for services. More people will be forced to take unnecessary trips to their GP and even A&E, which is completely counter to NHS England’s vision in the Five Year Forward View.
“If the government wants to ensure that health service is more efficient and focused on preventing ill health, then surely we should be investing more – not less – in pharmacies and other preventive services.
“This was the latest in a chain of fig-leaf consultations from the Conservative Government, which is more concerned about cutting costs in a desperate attempt to make ends meet than creating an NHS that meets the needs of patients.”
Norman Lamb has today (13th October) highlighted the need to tackle high smoking rates for people suffering with mental health conditions, and called on the Government to make this a priority in the new Tobacco Control Plan.
At a Westminster Hall Debate on tobacco control, Mr Lamb, the Liberal Democrat spokesperson for Health, reaffirmed the health risks associated with tobacco products. Smoking remains the largest cause of preventable illnesses and deaths in the country and it is estimated that around 96,000 people die in the UK from smoking-related diseases each year.
Smoking is responsible for half of the difference in life expectancy between the lowest and highest income groups. In today’s debate, however, Mr. Lamb was keen to draw specific attention to another social inequality: the impact of smoking on people with mental illness. People suffering from severe mental illness die on average 10-20 years earlier than the general population, with smoking identified as a major cause of this gap in life expectancy.
The UK has made significant progress in reducing smoking prevalence, including through Liberal Democrat Coalition successes on plain packaging for cigarettes and the ban on smoking in cars with children on board. However, smoking rates among people with mental health conditions have remained stubbornly high over the last 20 years, at a time when rates have been steadily declining across the general population.
Mr. Lamb called for the new Tobacco Control Plan to directly address the failures of public health strategies to reduce smoking among people with mental ill health, and to set ambitious targets for reducing smoking among this group. In particular, he encouraged the Government to focus on training mental health professionals so that they understand the importance of smoking cessation for recovery and see this as part of their core role.
Mr. Lamb also highlighted the importance of pursuing the objective of smoke-free inpatient mental health settings - a strategy that he initiated as a Minister. Smoking breaks are normalised as part of the daily routine in many psychiatric wards, using up valuable staff time and stifling efforts to encourage people not to smoke. Recently, however, a number of mental health trusts have made progress towards delivering care in completely smoke-free grounds with access to high-quality on-site stop smoking services, having a beneficial effect on the physical and mental health of patients, reducing aggressive behaviour, and freeing up staff time to focus on therapeutic activities.
In other areas, Mr Lamb:
- Challenged the Government to do more to recognise and promote the massive potential benefits of electronic cigarettes as an alternative to smoking tobacco, and to review the impact of the European Tobacco Products Directive which takes an excessively tough approach to the promotion of these products;
- Stressed the UK’s world leading role in tobacco control, and the need for the new tobacco plan to set out details on how the Government will use the Overseas Development Assistance Fund that has been established for combating smoking in developing countries; and
- Highlighted the importance of public health funding to ensure that local authorities can continue to provide high-quality stop smoking services in the community. He reinforced the Health Select Committee’s conclusion that the Government is finding extra money for front-line NHS services by cutting funding for public health and staff training, and called on the Government to review this counter-productive approach.
You can read Norman's speech in full here.
I would like to bring to your attention the plans that are currently underway to develop one of the UKs largest offshore wind farms off the North Norfolk Coastline. The proposed Norfolk Vanguard Offshore wind farm will be situated 47Km off the Norfolk coast, and has the potential to provide power for more than 1.3 million homes.
Currently there is a significant amount of research, discussion and preparation that needs to take place, providing many opportunities for the public to get involved and influence the project.
Drop in sessions will be taking place to provide an opportunity to meet with the project team and discuss the proposal. At these sessions you will be able to learn more about the current plans, share your views on the key issues and help shape the planned wind farm proposal.
Dates and Times of drop in sessions taking place across North Norfolk:
For more information, please see the Norfolk Vanguard website: http://eastanglia.technocreative.se/article/about-project
Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrat MP for North Norfolk, has urged the Government to approach the Octagon Healthcare consortium to consider sharing some its PFI profits with the troubled Norfolk and Norwich Hospital (N&N).
Last year, Octagon reported record profits of £5 million (after tax and dividend payments to shareholders) while the N&N suffered a record deficit of £21 million. This is despite the fact that the hospital continues to pay tens of millions of pounds to the consortium each year under the terms of its PFI contract, with repayments totalling £42.5 million in 2015/16.
Mr. Lamb raised concerns over the financial implications of the deal at Health Questions in the House of Commons this morning, highlighting a 2005 report by the National Audit Office which concluded that the PFI deal to build and maintain the hospital is costing a premium for the taxpayer and the NHS.
In the Commons, he challenged the Minister to make a formal approach to Octagon Healthcare “to consider foregoing part of its profit to help confront the enormous financial black hole that this trust faces”. It comes a week after Mr. Lamb wrote to the General Manager of the consortium to make the case for a voluntary concession on the PFI repayments owed by the hospital, in light of the stark differences in the organisations’ financial fortunes.
In response, Health Minister Philip Dunne pointed to the Government’s £1.5bn bailout fund to support hospital trusts struggling with debts caused by PFI contracts, but acknowledged that the Norfolk and Norwich is not among the seven trusts currently benefiting from the fund. He offered a meeting to discuss the proposal further, which Mr. Lamb intends to take up.
Commenting afterwards, Norman Lamb said:
“It seems impossible to justify the excessive profits made by Octagon at a time when the Norfolk and Norfolk is falling deeper into the red. Health services in Norfolk are already buckling under the pressure of rising demand and a severe shortage of funding which the Government has so far failed to address.
“Patient care is being directly affected by this outrageous PFI deal, which should never have been given the green light in the first place, as millions of pounds that is desperately needed for bolstering frontline services is instead going into the pockets of shareholders.
“The Government’s PFI bailout scheme is recognition of the major flaws in these contracts, which represent dreadful value for money and are simply not sustainable for many hospitals already facing extreme financial pressure.
“I hope that the Government will take swift action to negotiate a sharing of Octagon’s profits or a voluntary concession on the payments owed to it, to ease the burden on the hospital and ultimately free up resources so that patients can receive the care and treatment they need.”
The full exchange in the House of Commons is as follows:
Norman Lamb MP: The National Audit Office concluded that the PFI contract for the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital was a bad deal for the taxpayer and for the NHS, yet last year Octagon Healthcare made a record profit as the Norfolk and Norwich finances sunk ever further into the red. Would the Minister consider making a formal approach to Octagon Healthcare to consider foregoing part of its profit to help confront the enormous financial black hole that this trust faces?
Health Minister, Philip Dunne MP: We have provided access for seven of the worst affected trusts with obligations under PFI to some £1.5bn of a support fund to help them with these obligations. I’m not sure off the top of my head whether Norfolk is one of these – I suspect it is not. I’d be very happy to talk to him about this, but I think what I have to say to the Honourable Gentleman rather than raising his hopes inappropriately is that many of these schemes are too costly to divert resources to pay off in their absolute.
Eastern Daily Press - Revealed: How shareholders of PFI firm are making millions from cash-strapped Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (26th September 2016)
BBC News - High price for PFI deal concerns (10th June 2005)
National Audit Office - The Refinancing of the Norfolk and Norwich PFI Hospital: How the deal can be viewed in the light of the refinancing (June 2005)